Thematic analysisR

Reflexivity

The researcher's ongoing reflection on how their own position, assumptions and choices shape the analysis.

On this page
  1. In more detail
  2. In Themescape
  3. Where to read more

In more detail

In reflexive thematic analysis the researcher's subjectivity is treated as a resource for analysis rather than a bias to be removed. Reflexivity is the practice of noticing and recording how that subjectivity works: what the researcher brings, what they expected, and why they made the choices they did.

Many researchers keep a reflexive journal alongside their coding, and describe their position in the method section. Recording why a theme was reshaped, or why two codes were joined, is part of the same practice.

In Themescape

The notes column of the Data tab is kept for your own memos and ignored by the viewer, and a connection carries a note saying why you linked two themes or codes. Neither is a substitute for a reflexive journal, but both keep reasoning beside the data.

Boundaries andOverworkBlurredhoursNo offswitchEmail atnightWeekendworkBoundaries and Overwork
The viewer with a theme selected, its codes around it and its definition in the panel. Sample data.

Where to read more

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

Related terms

The words that sit closest to this one.

See your own themes come to life

Try the live demo or start a 7 day free trial. Your data is read in your browser and never leaves your computer.